Three scenarios dominate the claims data. First, a compromised vendor email chain leads your AP team to redirect a legitimate invoice payment to a new bank account controlled by a criminal. Second, a spoofed executive email instructs your controller to wire funds for a confidential acquisition or urgent tax payment. Third, a threat actor compromises your company's own email system and intercepts outbound payment instructions to your clients, redirecting incoming payments. Each scenario triggers a different coverage grant, and some policies cover only one or two of the three.
Common Wire Transfer Loss Scenarios
A Phoenix-based controller receives an email from what appears to be the company's CEO, requesting an urgent wire transfer to close an acquisition. The email address is off by one character. By the time anyone notices, $340,000 has left the account and is unrecoverable. This scenario plays out across Arizona every week, and the financial consequences fall squarely on the business unless the right coverage is already in place. Cyber crime insurance for Arizona businesses, covering computer fraud, funds transfer fraud, and social engineering fraud, is no longer a theoretical safeguard. It is a financial necessity for companies operating in Phoenix, Tucson, Scottsdale, and throughout the state.
Total reported U.S. cybercrime losses
surpassed $20 billion in 2025, with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center now averaging nearly 3,000 complaints per day. Arizona businesses are not insulated from these numbers. Small and mid-market companies, those with 10 to 500 employees, face particular exposure because they often lack dedicated security operations centers yet handle enough revenue to attract sophisticated threat actors. The gap between what a standard commercial policy covers and what a targeted cyber crime policy covers is where most claim denials originate. Understanding that gap before a loss occurs is the entire point of this guide.
Understanding Cyber Threats for Arizona Businesses
The Rising Risk in Phoenix, Tucson, and Scottsdale
Arizona's rapid economic growth has made the state a magnet for both legitimate enterprise and criminal targeting. Phoenix alone has seen a surge in technology, healthcare, and financial services firms, all of which handle sensitive payment data and personally identifiable information. A 2026 risk assessment found that Phoenix-area small businesses face elevated exposure to business email compromise, ransomware, and invoice manipulation schemes.
Tucson's defense and aerospace corridor creates a different risk profile: contractors handling controlled unclassified information are prime targets for credential theft. Scottsdale's concentration of wealth management, real estate, and hospitality businesses means high-value wire transfers move through relatively small offices with minimal verification protocols. Each metro area presents distinct threat vectors, but the common thread is that criminals follow the money, and Arizona's economy is generating plenty of it.
Why Standard General Liability Isn't Enough
A general liability policy responds to bodily injury and property damage claims. It does not respond to a fraudulent wire transfer, a compromised vendor payment, or a manipulated ACH file. Commercial crime policies, which some businesses already carry, may cover employee dishonesty or forgery, but they typically exclude losses caused by a third party impersonating an employee or vendor through electronic means.
This exclusion is precisely where social engineering fraud lives. The loss is real, the funds are gone, and the policy form does not recognize the event as a covered peril. A cyber crime insurance policy written with explicit insuring agreements for computer fraud, funds transfer fraud, and social engineering fraud fills that structural gap. Without it, you are self-insuring the most common and most expensive category of cyber loss in the country.
By: Caden Braly
Founder of Bloc Cyber Insurance
INDEX
Bloc Cyber and Its Licensed Producers Are Authorized to Place Cyber Coverage in All 50 U.S. States and The District of Columbia.
Cyber liability insurance covers the financial losses your business faces after a cyberattack or data breach. This page explains what the coverage includes, who needs it, what it costs, and how Bloc Cyber helps you get protected fast.
We start with a twenty-minute call to walk through your contracts, your draw process, your tech stack, and the last twelve months of attempted fraud. From there we go to market with ten-plus carriers, benchmark terms side-by-side, and present the options in plain language with recommended limits and retentions. Most intakes get indicative terms within one business day.
Forensic Investigations: Identifying the Source and Scope
Forensic investigators determine how the attacker got in, what data was accessed, whether exfiltration occurred, and whether the threat actor is still present in the network. Their report drives every downstream decision: which individuals must be notified, whether payment card brands must be alerted, and what remediation steps are necessary. Forensic engagements for mid-market companies commonly run between $30,000 and $150,000, depending on the complexity of the environment. The policy form may impose a separate sublimit on forensic costs or bundle them under a single breach response aggregate. Bloc Cyber reviews these sublimits at the insuring-agreement level before binding, so clients understand exactly how much forensic coverage they are purchasing and where the cap sits relative to their actual exposure.
The Three Pillars of Financial Fraud Coverage
Computer Fraud vs. Funds Transfer Fraud
These two coverage grants sound similar but respond to different loss mechanisms. Computer fraud coverage typically applies when a third party uses a computer to unlawfully transfer, pay, or deliver money or securities from your account. The key trigger is unauthorized access to or manipulation of your computer system. If a hacker breaches your accounting software and initiates a payment, computer fraud is the insuring agreement that should respond.
Funds transfer fraud coverage is narrower. It applies when a third party issues fraudulent transfer instructions to your financial institution, causing that institution to transfer funds from your account. The distinction matters because courts have drawn sharp lines between these two grants. A 2024 appellate decision denied a computer fraud claim because the loss resulted from fraudulent instructions to a bank, not from direct manipulation of the insured's own system. If your policy carries only one of these two grants, you have a coverage gap that a claim will expose.
The Social Engineering Fraud Endorsement
Social engineering fraud is the most common loss trigger for Arizona businesses in the 10-to-500-employee range. It covers losses that result from an employee being deceived by a person impersonating a vendor, client, or executive into voluntarily transferring funds. The word "voluntarily" is critical: because the employee authorized the transfer, neither computer fraud nor funds transfer fraud coverage typically applies.
Most carriers offer social engineering fraud as an endorsement, not as part of the base form. That endorsement often carries a sublimit significantly lower than the policy's aggregate, sometimes $100,000 or $250,000 on a $1 million policy. Bloc Cyber's approach is to review these sublimits at the endorsement level before binding, so you know exactly what your exposure looks like if a spoofed email gets past your verification process. Roughly 85% of cybercrime losses in 2025 traced back to human error, which makes this endorsement one of the most important line items on any cyber policy.
We start with a twenty-minute call to walk through your contracts, your draw process, your tech stack, and the last twelve months of attempted fraud. From there we go to market with ten-plus carriers, benchmark terms side-by-side, and present the options in plain language with recommended limits and retentions. Most intakes get indicative terms within one business day.
FAQ: Does my general business insurance cover hacking?
Almost certainly not. Standard CGL and BOP policies contain electronic data exclusions. Even if your policy has a small "data breach" endorsement, it is typically capped at $50,000 to $100,000, which will not cover a meaningful incident. A standalone cyber liability form provides the breadth and limits required for a real claim.
FAQ: How does a consent order affect my future premiums?
A consent order signals increased risk to underwriters. Expect premium increases at renewal, potentially 25 to 100 percent or more depending on the severity of the order and your compliance track record. Some carriers may decline to renew entirely if the consent order reveals systemic compliance failures.
Law firm cyber coverage is not a commodity product you can purchase by checking a box on a general liability application. The risks are specific: trust account fraud, privileged document exposure, deal data theft, multi-state notification obligations, and business interruption measured in lost billable hours. Your policy needs to reflect those risks at the insuring-agreement level, with sub-limits and retentions that match your actual exposure.
Do not wait for a breach to discover that your social engineering sub-limit is $100,000 on a $1.2 million wire or that your business-interruption waiting period is 24 hours when your systems were down for a week. If you are purchasing your first cyber policy or renewing an existing one, have a specialist review the actual policy form with you. Bloc Cyber's practice is built entirely around cyber, technology E&O, and AI liability placement. You can
request a coverage review to have a specialist walk through the insuring agreements, sub-limits, and exclusions specific to your firm's risk profile before you bind.
Comparing Coverage: Basic vs. Comprehensive Cyber Insurance
Not all cyber crime policies are structured the same way. A basic policy may include only first-party breach response and a single fraud coverage grant. A comprehensive form will separate each fraud type into its own insuring agreement with distinct limits, retentions, and conditions.
| Coverage Feature | Basic Cyber Policy | Comprehensive Cyber Crime Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Fraud | Often included with low sublimit | Separate insuring agreement, higher limit available |
| Funds Transfer Fraud | May be excluded or bundled | Distinct grant with bank-notification requirements |
| Social Engineering Fraud | Rarely included | Available as endorsement with negotiable sublimit |
| Vendor/Supplier Fraud | Excluded | May be covered under social engineering endorsement |
| Voluntary Parting Exclusion | Broadly applied | Narrowed or removed via endorsement |
| Waiting Period for System Failure | 12-24 hours | 6-8 hours, sometimes negotiable |
| Regulatory Defense (AZ breach law) | Limited or absent | Included with separate defense limit |
The voluntary parting exclusion deserves special attention. Many commercial crime and basic cyber forms exclude losses where the insured voluntarily parts with funds, even if induced by fraud. A comprehensive form either removes that exclusion or carves it back through the social engineering endorsement. If your current policy contains a broad voluntary parting exclusion and no social engineering endorsement, you effectively have no coverage for the most common fraud scenario facing Arizona businesses.
We start with a twenty-minute call to walk through your contracts, your draw process, your tech stack, and the last twelve months of attempted fraud. From there we go to market with ten-plus carriers, benchmark terms side-by-side, and present the options in plain language with recommended limits and retentions. Most intakes get indicative terms within one business day.
| Coverage Element | Commercial General Liability | Cyber Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Data breach notification costs | Not covered | Covered under first-party |
| Ransomware payment | Not covered | Covered (subject to sublimit) |
| Regulatory defense | Not covered | Covered under third-party |
| Business interruption from cyberattack | Not covered | Covered with waiting period |
| Funds transfer fraud | Not covered | Covered via cyber crime endorsement |
| Third-party lawsuit over data loss | Excluded or severely limited | Covered under third-party liability |
| Technology product failure | Not covered | Covered under Tech E&O |
Most states have not passed explicit statutes declaring regulatory fines insurable or uninsurable. Instead, the question turns on public policy: courts in some jurisdictions hold that allowing insurance to pay a punitive or regulatory fine would undermine the fine's deterrent purpose. New York, for example, has case law suggesting that certain regulatory penalties are uninsurable on public policy grounds. Texas and California courts have taken different positions depending on the type of fine and the regulatory scheme involved.
Your policy form will typically include language stating that fines and penalties are covered "to the extent insurable under applicable law." This shifts the jurisdictional analysis to the time of claim. Bloc Cyber maintains state-by-state fluency in breach-notification triggers and regulatory defense exposure, which matters when your operations span multiple states with different public policy positions on fine insurability.
State-by-State Variations in Public Policy and Uninsurable Fines
Companies with operations in the EU, UK, or Asia-Pacific face additional complexity. GDPR fines imposed by European data protection authorities can reach four percent of global annual revenue. Whether a US-placed policy can respond to a GDPR fine depends on the policy's territorial scope, the choice-of-law provisions, and whether the jurisdiction where the fine is imposed permits its insurance.
Many standard cyber forms limit territorial coverage to the United States and its territories. If your company has employees, customers, or data processing activities in Europe, you need a form with international regulatory coverage or a locally admitted policy in the relevant jurisdiction. The cost of getting this wrong is not theoretical: monitor and compliance fees in cross-border enforcement actions can compound rapidly when multiple regulators coordinate investigations.
International Considerations for Multinational Regulatory Risks
Addressing Known Issues and Exclusions
Any issue identified during diligence that is disclosed to the underwriter becomes a known issue and is excluded from coverage. This is a fundamental principle of R&W insurance: it covers unknown breaches, not problems you already know about. Buyers sometimes assume they can disclose a problem and still obtain coverage for it. They cannot. The underwriter will carve out any known matter, and the buyer must negotiate a specific indemnity from the seller or accept the risk. This is where the interplay between your diligence process and your insurance placement becomes critical: thoroughness in diligence improves your coverage, but every issue you find narrows it.
For companies that carry cyber liability or technology E&O policies, this dynamic should feel familiar. At Bloc Cyber, we see a parallel in how cyber insurers evaluate a company's security posture before binding coverage: known vulnerabilities get excluded or trigger higher retentions, just as known issues do in R&W underwriting.
How much does cyber insurance cost for a small firm?
A firm of 10 to 25 attorneys can typically expect premiums in the range of $3,000 to $12,000 annually for $1 million in coverage, depending on practice areas, security controls in place, and claims history. Firms handling real estate closings or M&A work will pay more because of the wire-fraud exposure.
Your SOC 2 report documents what your controls look like. Your cyber policy form defines what happens financially when those controls fail. A first-party breach response grant typically covers forensic investigation, legal counsel, notification costs, and credit monitoring. A third-party liability grant covers defense costs and settlements arising from claims by affected individuals or businesses. Technology E&O coverage responds when a failure in your product or service causes financial harm to a client.
The critical question is whether the policy form covers the specific failure mode your SOC 2 report flagged. If your report noted an exception in access management and an attacker later exploited that exact weakness, the carrier's claims team will review whether the application was answered accurately. Misrepresentation on an application can void coverage entirely, which is why aligning your SOC 2 findings with your insurance application answers is not optional.
The table above shows that SOC 2 and cyber insurance requirements overlap heavily, but insurance applications often go further on specific technical controls. A SOC 2 report alone does not satisfy every underwriting question.
Evaluating Limits and Deductibles for Your Local Business
Determining Appropriate Coverage Amounts
Limit selection should start with your maximum single-transfer exposure. If your accounts payable department can authorize a wire transfer of $500,000 without secondary approval, your social engineering sublimit needs to reflect that reality. A $100,000 sublimit on a policy with a $1 million aggregate leaves $400,000 of that exposure uninsured.
For computer fraud and funds transfer fraud, consider your average bank balance and the maximum amount a threat actor could extract before detection. Many mid-market Arizona businesses carry aggregate limits between $1 million and $5 million, with social engineering sublimits ranging from $250,000 to $1 million. The cyber insurance market in 2026 reflects increasing granularity in how carriers price these sublimits, so higher social engineering limits are available but priced based on your internal controls.
Arizona's breach notification statute, codified under A.R.S. § 18-552, imposes specific timelines and notification requirements that can generate regulatory defense costs. Those costs consume policy limits unless the form provides a separate defense allocation. Confirm whether your regulatory defense limit is inside or outside the aggregate before you bind.
The Impact of Security Controls on Premiums
Carriers underwrite cyber crime coverage based on the controls you have in place to prevent fraud. Dual-authorization requirements on wire transfers above a threshold, callback verification procedures for payment changes, and email authentication protocols like DMARC all factor into pricing. A company with documented callback procedures and enforced multi-factor authentication on financial systems will see materially lower premiums than one without.
Bloc Cyber works with clients to identify which controls the underwriter will credit at renewal and which gaps need to be closed before binding. This is not a generic checklist exercise. It is a form-level review of what the carrier requires as a condition of coverage and what they will reward with premium reduction. Small businesses that lack basic cyber hygiene protocols face both higher premiums and higher claim-denial rates, so the investment in controls pays for itself on both sides of the equation.
The gap between a basic crime policy and a comprehensive fraud protection program is significant. The table below highlights key differences.
We start with a twenty-minute call to walk through your contracts, your draw process, your tech stack, and the last twelve months of attempted fraud. From there we go to market with ten-plus carriers, benchmark terms side-by-side, and present the options in plain language with recommended limits and retentions. Most intakes get indicative terms within one business day.
This comparison illustrates why a general liability policy, even one with a broad "personal and advertising injury" grant, will not respond to a regulatory proceeding. The coverage must be placed specifically under a cyber or technology E&O form that includes regulatory defense as a named insuring agreement.
| Coverage Feature | Basic Crime Policy | Comprehensive Cyber with Fraud Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Fraud | Typically included | Included |
| Social Engineering | Optional endorsement, low sublimit | Included, higher sublimits available |
| Push Payment Fraud | Often excluded | May be covered as separate grant |
| Account Takeover | May fall under computer fraud | Explicitly covered |
| Forensic Investigation | Not covered | First-party expense coverage |
| Legal and Regulatory Costs | Not covered | Included |
| Callback Verification Required | Yes, strict condition | Yes, but terms vary by form |
| Typical Sublimit Range | $100K - $250K | $250K - $1M+ |
R&W retentions function similarly to a deductible but are typically structured as a percentage of enterprise value. A common retention for mid-market deals sits between 1% and 3% of the transaction value. On a $50 million deal, that means the buyer absorbs the first $500,000 to $1.5 million of covered losses before the insurer pays anything. The retention exists because underwriters expect the buyer's own diligence to catch smaller issues. Retention levels are negotiable and vary by carrier, deal size, and the quality of the diligence package presented during underwriting.
How Retention Works as a Deductible
The Transition from Retention to Drop-Down Coverage
Most R&W policies include a drop-down feature that reduces the retention, often by half, after a specified period, typically 12 months post-closing. If the original retention is $1 million, it drops to $500,000 after the first year. This mechanism reflects the assumption that the most significant breaches surface early. The reduced retention in the later period provides the buyer with more accessible coverage for claims that emerge after the initial post-closing adjustment period. Some policies offer a full drop to zero retention after 18 or 24 months, though this depends on the specific terms negotiated with the underwriter.
Frequently Asked Questions About Arizona Cyber Insurance
Does my commercial crime policy already cover social engineering fraud? Most commercial crime forms exclude losses where you voluntarily transfer funds, even under fraudulent pretenses. A separate social engineering fraud endorsement on a cyber policy is typically required to fill that gap.
What is the difference between cyber liability insurance and cyber crime insurance? Cyber liability responds to breach-related costs: forensics, notification, regulatory defense, and third-party lawsuits. Cyber crime coverage responds to direct financial loss from fraud. Many comprehensive policies include both, but they are distinct insuring agreements.
How much social engineering coverage do I need? Start with your largest single payment that could be authorized without secondary approval. Your sublimit should at least match that figure. Many Arizona businesses in the $5 million to $50 million revenue range carry social engineering sublimits of $250,000 to $500,000.
Are there Arizona-specific regulations that affect my cyber policy? Yes. Arizona's data breach notification law under A.R.S. § 18-552 requires notification within 45 days of discovery. Recent legislative updates have tightened insurance and financial institution rules in the state, which can affect both coverage requirements and regulatory exposure.
Can I add cyber crime coverage to my existing business owner's policy? Some carriers offer limited endorsements on a BOP, but these typically carry low sublimits and broad exclusions. A standalone cyber policy with dedicated fraud insuring agreements provides significantly stronger protection.
Do I need cyber crime coverage if I outsource my IT? Yes. Outsourcing IT does not transfer the financial risk of a fraudulent wire transfer or a compromised payment. Your managed service provider's errors and omissions policy does not cover your direct financial loss from social engineering.
We start with a twenty-minute call to walk through your contracts, your draw process, your tech stack, and the last twelve months of attempted fraud. From there we go to market with ten-plus carriers, benchmark terms side-by-side, and present the options in plain language with recommended limits and retentions. Most intakes get indicative terms within one business day.
| Coverage Element | Commercial General Liability | Cyber Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Data breach notification costs | Not covered | Covered under first-party |
| Ransomware payment | Not covered | Covered (subject to sublimit) |
| Regulatory defense | Not covered | Covered under third-party |
| Business interruption from cyberattack | Not covered | Covered with waiting period |
| Funds transfer fraud | Not covered | Covered via cyber crime endorsement |
| Third-party lawsuit over data loss | Excluded or severely limited | Covered under third-party liability |
| Technology product failure | Not covered | Covered under Tech E&O |
Most states have not passed explicit statutes declaring regulatory fines insurable or uninsurable. Instead, the question turns on public policy: courts in some jurisdictions hold that allowing insurance to pay a punitive or regulatory fine would undermine the fine's deterrent purpose. New York, for example, has case law suggesting that certain regulatory penalties are uninsurable on public policy grounds. Texas and California courts have taken different positions depending on the type of fine and the regulatory scheme involved.
Your policy form will typically include language stating that fines and penalties are covered "to the extent insurable under applicable law." This shifts the jurisdictional analysis to the time of claim. Bloc Cyber maintains state-by-state fluency in breach-notification triggers and regulatory defense exposure, which matters when your operations span multiple states with different public policy positions on fine insurability.
State-by-State Variations in Public Policy and Uninsurable Fines
Companies with operations in the EU, UK, or Asia-Pacific face additional complexity. GDPR fines imposed by European data protection authorities can reach four percent of global annual revenue. Whether a US-placed policy can respond to a GDPR fine depends on the policy's territorial scope, the choice-of-law provisions, and whether the jurisdiction where the fine is imposed permits its insurance.
Many standard cyber forms limit territorial coverage to the United States and its territories. If your company has employees, customers, or data processing activities in Europe, you need a form with international regulatory coverage or a locally admitted policy in the relevant jurisdiction. The cost of getting this wrong is not theoretical: monitor and compliance fees in cross-border enforcement actions can compound rapidly when multiple regulators coordinate investigations.
International Considerations for Multinational Regulatory Risks
Addressing Known Issues and Exclusions
Any issue identified during diligence that is disclosed to the underwriter becomes a known issue and is excluded from coverage. This is a fundamental principle of R&W insurance: it covers unknown breaches, not problems you already know about. Buyers sometimes assume they can disclose a problem and still obtain coverage for it. They cannot. The underwriter will carve out any known matter, and the buyer must negotiate a specific indemnity from the seller or accept the risk. This is where the interplay between your diligence process and your insurance placement becomes critical: thoroughness in diligence improves your coverage, but every issue you find narrows it.
For companies that carry cyber liability or technology E&O policies, this dynamic should feel familiar. At Bloc Cyber, we see a parallel in how cyber insurers evaluate a company's security posture before binding coverage: known vulnerabilities get excluded or trigger higher retentions, just as known issues do in R&W underwriting.
Post-Incident Forensic and Legal Obligations
After a SCADA or OT intrusion, you will likely face parallel investigations: your own internal forensic team, your insurer's panel forensics firm, CISA, and potentially your state public utility commission. A coordinated attack on Minnesota water utilities demonstrated how quickly a regional incident can trigger multi-agency scrutiny.
Your policy should not restrict your choice of forensic investigators to a panel that lacks OT expertise. If the form requires you to use a pre-approved vendor, confirm that vendor has ICS forensic capability. The wrong forensic team can miss artifacts specific to industrial protocols like Modbus or DNP3, leaving you with an incomplete investigation and a disputed claim.
How much does cyber insurance cost for a small firm?
A firm of 10 to 25 attorneys can typically expect premiums in the range of $3,000 to $12,000 annually for $1 million in coverage, depending on practice areas, security controls in place, and claims history. Firms handling real estate closings or M&A work will pay more because of the wire-fraud exposure.
Making the Right Choice for Your Digital Security
Cyber crime coverage for Arizona businesses is not a single product with a single price. It is a set of insuring agreements, endorsements, sublimits, and conditions that must be matched to your specific risk profile. A Phoenix medical practice, a Tucson defense subcontractor, and a Scottsdale wealth management firm all need fraud coverage, but the form should look different for each.
The most consequential decisions happen at the policy-form level: whether social engineering carries its own adequate sublimit, whether the voluntary parting exclusion has been addressed, whether funds transfer fraud and computer fraud are granted separately, and whether regulatory defense costs erode your aggregate. These are not details you discover after a claim. They are details you confirm before binding.
If your business operates in Arizona and handles wire transfers, ACH payments, or vendor invoicing, a form-level review of your cyber crime coverage is worth the time. Bloc Cyber's specialists can walk through your policy with you, identify where the coverage grant stops, and show you what that gap costs. Request a coverage review to see exactly where your current policy stands before the next spoofed email lands in your controller's inbox.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Caden Braly
— Founder, Bloc Cyber
I'm Caden Braly, founder of Bloc Cyber, the specialty cyber insurance arm of Braly Insurance. I built Bloc Cyber around one idea: businesses deserve coverage that actually responds when a cyberattack happens. I work closely with clients to understand their exposure, place the right policy through specialty carriers, and stand with them through the claim. My goal is simple — give every business straight answers and protection they can trust.
Full profile → caden@bloccyber.com LinkedIn
Industries We Protect
Cyber Coverage Built for Your Industry
Every industry faces a different cyber threat, from patient records in healthcare to wire fraud in construction. Bloc Cyber matches coverage to the risks your sector actually faces, drawing on specialty carriers that understand your business. Find your industry below to see how we protect it.
Healthcare
Banking
Retail / E-Commerce
Legal
Technology / SaaS
Education
Energy / Utilities
Manufacturing
Construction
Defense
Healthcare
HIPAA-grade protection for patient data
725
healthcare breaches disclosed in 2024
HIPAA-grade protection for patient data
▣ Ransomware on EHR systems
▣ PHI exfiltration
▣ Medical device exploits
▣ Business email compromise
Sub-sectors we place
Hospitals and health systems
Physician practices and specialty clinics
Dental practices and DSOs
Behavioral health and addiction treatment centers
Medical billing and revenue cycle management firms
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Banking
Coverage that meets FFIEC and NYDFS expectations
$5.9M
average cost of a financial sector breach
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Wire fraud and BEC
▣ Credential stuffing
▣ Third-party vendor risk
▣ Ransomware
Sub-sectors we place
Community banks
Credit unions
Mortgage lenders and loan originators
Wealth management and RIAs
Payment processors and merchant acquirers
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Retail / E-Commerce
PCI-DSS aligned coverage for every checkout
42%
of retailers hit by ransomware in the last year
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Magecart / card skimming
▣ POS malware
▣ Account takeover
▣ Supply-chain intrusion
Sub-sectors we place
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands
Shopify and marketplace sellers
Brick-and-mortar multi-location retailers
Restaurants and QSR franchises
Grocery and specialty food retail
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Legal
Privilege, client files, and trust-account safeguards
1 in 4
law firms reported a breach in 2024
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Wire-transfer fraud
▣ Privileged data theft
▣ Email account compromise
▣ Ransomware
Sub-sectors we place
AmLaw / large firms
Boutique litigation firms
Personal injury and plaintiffs’ firms
Estate planning and trust attorneys
Title and real estate closing firms
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Technology / SaaS
SOC 2 and ISO-aligned risk transfer
$4.88M
avg. cost of a SaaS breach in 2024
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Supply-chain attacks
▣ Cloud misconfiguration
▣ Token and key theft
▣ Zero-day exploits
Sub-sectors we place
B2B SaaS platforms
Managed service providers (MSPs) and MSSPs
Fintech startups
AI and machine learning companies
Cloud hosting and infrastructure providers
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Education
FERPA-aligned coverage for student and research data
80%
of K–12 districts hit by ransomware since 2022
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Ransomware on district networks
▣ Student PII theft
▣ Fake invoice fraud
▣ DDoS on exam platforms
Sub-sectors we place
K-12 public school districts
Private and charter schools
Colleges and universities
EdTech platforms
Tutoring, test prep, and online learning providers
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Energy / Utilities
OT and IT coverage for critical infrastructure
24/7
operational-tech monitoring requirements
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ ICS/SCADA intrusion
▣ Nation-state actors
▣ Ransomware on OT
▣ Insider threat
Sub-sectors we place
Municipal utilities (water, electric, gas)
Oil and gas operators
Pipeline and midstream companies
Renewable energy (solar, wind) developers
Electric cooperatives and rural utilities
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Manufacturing
Business interruption protection for connected plants
25%
of all ransomware attacks target manufacturing
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Ransomware halting production
▣ IP theft
▣ ICS exploits
▣ Vendor compromise
Sub-sectors we place
Industrial and heavy equipment manufacturers
Food and beverage processing
Pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers
Automotive and parts suppliers
Aerospace component manufacturers
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Construction
Protection for project files, wires, and jobsite tech
$200K+
average wire-fraud loss in construction
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ Wire-transfer diversion
▣ BEC on project payments
▣ Stolen bid data
▣ Ransomware
Sub-sectors we place
General contractors
Commercial HVAC, electrical, and plumbing subs
Civil and infrastructure contractors
Homebuilders and residential developers
Architecture and engineering (A&E) firms
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
Defense
CMMC, DFARS, and CUI-compliant risk transfer
CMMC
2.0 compliance required by 2026
Common threats we underwrite against
▣ CUI exfiltration
▣ Nation-state APTs
▣ Supply-chain compromise
▣ Cleared-personnel targeting
Sub-sectors we place
DoD prime contractors
CMMC-regulated subcontractors
Defense software and systems integrators
Aerospace and satellite contractors
Federal IT and cleared staffing firms
Typical turnaround for indication of terms: 1 business day.
The Bloc system
One foundation.
Ten industry-specific builds.
The Bloc mark is built from stackable planes — each one a different angle on the same core structure. That’s how we place coverage: one underwriting discipline, tuned and re-tuned for every industry we serve.
Coverage
A policy you can actually read.
Structured in three clean blocs.
01
First-Party
Your direct losses when an incident hits your business.
✓
Incident response & forensics
✓
Business interruption
✓ Data restoration
✓ Cyber extortion / ransomware
✓ Funds transfer fraud
✓ Reputational harm
02
Third-Party
Your liability to clients, partners, and regulators.
✓
Network security liability
✓
Privacy liability (HIPAA, GDPR, state laws)
✓ Regulatory defense & fines
✓ PCI-DSS fines and assessments
✓ Media liability
✓ Breach notification costs
03
Specialty
Advanced coverages for complex risks and contracts.
✓
Technology E&O
✓
Social engineering fraud
✓ Contingent business interruption
✓ Systems failure
✓ Bricking & hardware replacement
✓ CMMC / regulatory-specific endorsements
Typical limits placed
$1M / $1M starter
$5M / $10M mid-market
$25M+ layered towers
Custom retentions
Common Questions
Cyber Liability Insurance, Explained
What does cyber insurance cover?
Cyber insurance covers the financial losses from a data breach or cyberattack. This includes breach response, legal fees, customer notification, ransomware, business interruption, and regulatory fines, depending on your policy.
Does my business really need cyber insurance?
Yes. Any business that stores customer data, processes payments, or relies on connected systems faces cyber risk. Small and mid-sized companies are frequent targets because they often have fewer defenses.
How much does cyber insurance cost?
Cost depends on your industry, revenue, data volume, and security practices. We market your risk to multiple carriers to find strong coverage at a competitive price. Request a quote for an exact figure.
What is the difference between first-party and third-party cyber coverage?
First-party coverage pays for your own losses, like data recovery and lost income. Third-party coverage pays for claims from others harmed by a breach on your systems.
How fast can I get a quote?
Most clients receive a quote in under 24 hours after we review the details of their business and exposure.
What should I do first after a cyberattack?
Contact us right away. We help you start breach response, connect you with forensic and legal support, and guide your claim so you contain the damage quickly.
Insights
Field notes from the placement desk.
What carriers are asking right now.
Start a quote
Tell us about your business.
We’ll come back with terms.
We’ll review your stack, your contracts, and your exposure — then place the program against the right markets. Most intakes get indicative terms back within one business day.
01
Quick intake
We only ask what the carriers actually need.
02
Benchmark
Side-by-side terms from 10+ specialty cyber carriers.
03
Bind
Plain-language policy review, e-signed and in force.
